The alignment of corporations with entities involved in certain geopolitical contexts often brings them under scrutiny. The ties between renowned fashion and beauty brands with companies supportive of or investing in Israeli operations in occupied territories have sparked global conversations.
Advocates and consumers voice their dissent by choosing to abstain from purchasing, selling, or endorsing products and brands tied to such contentious relationships. The following details shed light on brands associated with these affiliations, highlighting the actions advised by those calling for ethical consumer behavior.
1. American Eagle
American Eagle’s explicit support for Israel, showcased on their flagship billboard in Times Square, aligns the brand with the controversial geopolitical landscape. To express dissent, abstaining from their products or employment opportunities might be an avenue for action.
2. Bulgari / Bvlgari
The ownership of Bulgari under LVMH, and the sizable investments of Bernard Arnault in Israeli companies, contextualize the brand’s geopolitical connections. Steering clear of Bulgari products or associations might reflect a stance on such affiliations.
With LVMH as its parent company and Bernard Arnault’s significant investments in Israeli companies, Celine’s position within the geopolitical spectrum invites consumers to consider their patronage of the brand and employment opportunities aligned with it.
Alain Wertheimer’s stance on the Israel-Gaza conflict and the associated financial pledges reflect the geopolitical positioning of Chanel. Choosing not to engage with Chanel’s products or support its employment offerings can be an avenue for expressing opinions on such affiliations.
5. Diesel Frangrances
L’Oreal’s association with Diesel Frangrances, and their alignment with Israel despite past disputes, frames the brand within a geopolitical context. Consumers might choose to refrain from supporting this brand to reflect their stance.
6. Dior / Christian Dior
The heavy investments by Bernard Arnault in Israeli companies, juxtaposed against Dior’s ownership by LVMH, positions the brand within the geopolitical spectrum. This context might influence consumer choices regarding Dior products and employment opportunities.
DKNY’s connection to LVMH and Bernard Arnault’s investments in Israeli companies provides a geopolitical backdrop that consumers might consider when contemplating brand engagement or job opportunities.
Fendi, owned by LVMH, stands alongside Bernard Arnault’s sizable investments in Israeli companies. This geopolitical association might prompt consumer decisions to refrain from supporting or seeking work within the brand.
9. Fenty Beauty by Rihanna
LVMH’s significant investments in Israeli companies and Fenty’s partial ownership under this conglomerate position the brand in the geopolitical sphere. Individuals might opt not to engage with Fenty Beauty products or employment opportunities aligned with it.
10. Giorgio Armani Beauty
Armani’s partnership with L’Oreal, despite a troubled past over geopolitical concerns, contextualizes the brand within certain geopolitical alliances. This context might influence consumer choices regarding their support for the brand or opportunities for employment.
The brand, under LVMH and ownership of Bernard Arnault, is significantly tied to investments in Israeli companies. Refraining from purchasing Givenchy products or involvement with the brand and its parent company might reflect a stance on such affiliations.
Owning ties to LVMH and Bernard Arnault’s investments in Israeli companies, Hublot falls within this geopolitical context. Choosing not to buy or sell Hublot products or engage in employment within the brand or its parent company can signify a position on these affiliations.
As part of LVMH and under the ownership of Bernard Arnault, Kenzo’s connections to substantial investments in Israeli companies form a geopolitical backdrop. Deciding not to buy or sell Kenzo products or partake in its employment might reflect a stance on these affiliations.
With LVMH as its parent company and significant investments by Bernard Arnault in Israeli companies, Loewe’s geopolitical context might influence consumer decisions. Avoiding the purchase or sale of Loewe products or work opportunities aligned with the brand or LVMH could signify a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
15. Louis Vuitton
Belonging to LVMH, Louis Vuitton is associated with substantial investments in Israeli companies by its owner, Bernard Arnault. Consumer decisions to refrain from buying or selling Louis Vuitton products or engaging in employment related to the brand and its parent company might reflect a stance on these affiliations.
16. Maison Francis Kurkdjian
As part of LVMH and with Bernard Arnault’s significant investments in Israeli companies, Maison Francis Kurkdjian exists within this geopolitical landscape. Abstaining from the purchase or sale of its products or employment within the brand or its parent company might reflect a stance on such affiliations.
17. Maison Margiela Fragrances
L’Oreal’s partnership with Maison Margiela Fragrances in the context of the company’s association with Israel and its apologies following previous disputes frames this brand within a geopolitical context. Choosing not to purchase or sell these products or engage in employment associated with L’Oreal signifies a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
18. Marc Jacobs
Under LVMH and the considerable investments by Bernard Arnault in Israeli companies, Marc Jacobs is situated within this geopolitical context. Deciding not to buy or sell Marc Jacobs products or engage in employment opportunities related to the brand or its parent company might signify a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
19. Mugler Beauty
Aligned with L’Oreal and its historical disputes involving Israel, Mugler Beauty stands within this geopolitical context. Opting out of purchasing or selling these products or pursuing employment with L’Oreal reflects a stance on these affiliations.
20. Prada Beauty
L’Oreal’s partnership with Prada Beauty following disputes with the Arab League places the brand within a geopolitical context. Choosing not to buy or sell these products or engage in employment with L’Oreal signifies a stance on these geopolitical affiliations.
The sportswear brand sponsors athletes and teams across various sports. However, Puma’s main sponsorship of the Israel Football Association (IFA), involving teams in Israel’s illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian land, has spurred concerns. A boycott stance has been proposed, urging individuals to avoid buying Puma products until the brand discontinues its sponsorship of the IFA and Israeli teams operating in illegal settlements. Additionally, refraining from working for Puma has been suggested.
22. Ralph Lauren Frangrances
Part of the L’Oreal partnership, Ralph Lauren Frangrances became entangled in geopolitical disputes after their cooperation with the ‘warm friend of Israel’. Individuals are encouraged to avoid purchasing or selling these fragrances and to refrain from working for L’Oreal Groupe due to their engagements and heavy investments in Occupied Palestine.
The footwear brand, Skechers, has faced controversy due to the public pro-Israel content shared by the company’s president, Michael S Greenberg. To show dissent, individuals have been advised against buying or selling Skechers products and suggested not to work for the Skechers Groupe due to these associations.
A brand established by Kim Kardashian, Skims received attention due to her comments condemning specific operations but not addressing Israel’s actions. As a response, the call to boycott Skims products and avoid selling them has been proposed, along with the suggestion to refrain from working for the brand.
25. STELLA by Stella McCartney
Being part of Bernard Arnault’s LVMH and its investments in Israeli companies, the brand’s association raises geopolitical concerns. To address these, consumers are encouraged to avoid buying or selling STELLA by Stella McCartney products and advised not to engage in employment with the brand or its parent company, LVMH.
26. TAG Heuer
Part of LVMH under Bernard Arnault, TAG Heuer’s connections to substantial investments in Israeli companies align it within this geopolitical landscape. As a result, the recommendation has been made to refrain from buying or selling TAG Heuer products and to avoid working for TAG Heuer or LVMH due to these geopolitical connections.
27. Ted Baker
Ted Baker, a UK-based clothing retailer, entered into a partnership with Delta Galil, allowing them to develop, produce, and distribute specific clothing lines. However, Delta Galil’s association with Israel prompted concerns regarding ethical alignment. The call to action suggests avoiding the purchase or sale of Ted Baker products unless they discontinue their partnership with Delta Galil or any other Israeli manufacturers. It also advises against seeking employment with the brand.
28. Tiffany & Co.
Owned by Bernard Arnault’s LVMH, Tiffany & Co. falls under the banner of extensive investments in Israeli companies. To express disapproval of such associations, individuals are encouraged to avoid purchasing or selling Tiffany & Co. products and advised not to work for the brand or LVMH.
29. Valentino Beauty
As part of L’Oreal’s extensive involvement with Israel, Valentino Beauty was implicated in controversies arising from this partnership. To reflect a stance against such associations, refraining from purchasing or selling Valentino Beauty products, and avoiding employment with L’Oreal Groupe, has been recommended.
30. Viktor & Rolf Beauty
Partnered with L’Oreal, Viktor & Rolf Beauty found itself amid controversies due to L’Oreal’s alignment with Israel. To express dissent, consumers and retailers are encouraged to avoid buying or selling Viktor & Rolf Beauty products and to refrain from working for L’Oreal Groupe.
31. Yves Saint Laurent Beauty / YSL Beauty
Part of the L’Oreal and Israel controversy, YSL Beauty came under scrutiny due to its association with the conglomerate. In response, the suggested course of action is to abstain from buying or selling YSL Beauty products and to avoid employment with L’Oreal Groupe due to its affiliations with Israel.
The consumer choices that individuals make regarding the brands they purchase, sell, or associate with have an impactful role in reflecting ethical standards. As revealed in the breakdown of these associations, the decisions to avoid brands affiliated with entities investing or supporting Israeli operations in occupied territories emphasize the public’s stand for ethical, socially responsible business practices.
The call for consumer awareness and conscientious action remains pivotal in the ongoing discourse surrounding geopolitical affiliations of major global brands.